Harry Reid Argues Auto Bailout Saved Ford

E-mail Print PDF

Every business has competition.  It's what drives innovation, capitalism, and job creation.  Look at the smartphone market for example.  The growth of Google's Android phones forces Apple to continue improving their iPhone.  This logic should apply to all businesses, unless you're Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.  When talking about the auto bailout, Reid argues that it was necessary to bailout General Motors (GM) and Chrysler in order for Ford to survive, who didn't take any bailout money and has been thriving.  Under this logic, Apple or the government would need to bailout Google to be successful.  We've said it before and we'll say it again: Harry Reid is mentally unstable.

"Isn't it a good thing today in America that we have an automobile manufacturing sector?  If it had been up to them (Republicans), GM would be gone.  If it were up to them, Ford would be gone.  Chrysler would definitely be gone.  We decided that they need help, just like in New York City needed help 25-years ago."

First off, Reid is wrong.  Ford didn't take any bailout money and has been kicking butt.  Reid claims that without the bailout, the United States wouldn't have an auto industry.  He believes and argues that Ford would have collapsed if the government didn't bail out the competition.  And liberals believe is a rational argument.

Talk about a distorted view of reality.  If GM and Chrysler went under, Ford would have been positioned as the only U.S. auto producer.  That's a dream from a positioning standpoint in the mind of any marketer.  Ford still has foreign competition, further making Reid's argument moronic.

Bailing out GM and Chrysler was a terrible idea.  It cost taxpayers $60 billion only to hear months later that they would declare bankruptcy.  You can't fault Harry Reid, though.  He's a socialist, so he sees nothing wrong with redistributing money to failing companies.  Granted, relying on a bailout doesn't provide any incentive for success, liberals believe that spending someone else's money is the way to prosperity.  Because we all know how well that system worked for Mao's China and the Soviet Union.  Just ask the over 100 million dead as the result of Communism.

Chuck Justice is the editor-in-chief for Habledash.

Follow Habledash on Facebook and Twitter!

Comments
Add New Search RSS
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
:D:angry::angry-red::evil::idea::love::x:no-comments::ooo::pirate::?::(
:sleep::););)):0
 
DeeJayBee  - Are you serious?.... |2010-07-22 13:22:49
Mental stability is certainly something you lack Chuck or at least knowlege of the auto industry in general.
It has to do with the supply chain, you know those companies who supply the automakers with parts. With the collapse of GM and Chrysler, a substantial portion of thier customer base would evapourate. Subsequently they too would go bankrupt or otherwise cease doing business as they wouldn't be able to replace this lost business fast enought to compensate.
Finally with the supply base thus destabilized, everyone else who relies on these companies to supply parts (i.e. Ford) would be in a real pickle. (Not to mention Toyota Honda etc.) If your going to blather on pointlessly, at least try to make your arguments stick instead of using pointless attacks.
Anonymous |2010-07-22 13:43:08
So you're saying that a competitor of GM or Chrysler wouldn't have tried to snatch up parts of the failing companies? Your argument about the supply chain isn't too strong. The point is that competitors don't benefit if their competition is bailed out. Harry Reid is a menace with zero private sector experience. And seeing the companies go bankrupt and having the taxpayers on the hook for $60 billion is repulsive. Who's to say that they couldn't have survived without the bailout? There's a good chance that they would have. Hey, at least Obama's United Auto Worker friends got to keep their jobs.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."

 

Translations


Stalk Habledash!

Facebook: Habledash2012 MySpace: habledash Twitter: Habledash YouTube: Habledash